Close-up of an electrocardiogram (ECG) printout with several labeled ECG electrode leads (A–G) connected to a monitoring device, displaying clear heart rhythm waveforms across multiple channels.

Hormone Therapy and Your Heart: What You Need to Know from the Women’s Health Initiative

Image placeholder

written by abdullah sagheer

July 11, 2025

Hormone therapy (HT) is quite an ordinary way of overcoming menopausal symptoms, and its impact on the state of the heart has always been the issue of debate. An interesting trial of Women health Initiative (WH I) Hormone Therapy Clinical trials, published under the title, Long-Term Changes to Cardiovascular Biomarkers After Hormone Therapy, throws some light on the role of HT in modifying important cardiovascular markers in postmenopausal women. In this study conducted by Matthew Nudy, MD and other authors, the researchers provide useful information to all women who either want to use the treatment or to have an interest on the cardiovascular effects of HT. So, to make the findings easier to comprehend, let us analyze them and find out how that translates to heart health.

What is the women health initiative?

Women Health Initiative is a legendary research, which has been conducting research on health related problems among women after menopause over the decades. In the HT trials, the study focus was particularly on the effects of use of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) as monotherapy or conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE+MPA) against a placebo. The trials were carried out on the effects of the HT on cardiovascular biomarkers that is, indicators of heart disease risks such as cholesterol levels and insulin resistance.

Key Findings: The cardiovascular biomarkers biomarker effects of hormone therapy

The research also followed the dynamics of various cardiovascular biomarkers monitoring how HT changed their condition and affects the health of the heart. The most vital takeaways are as follows:

Cholesterol LDL (LDL-C): other planners of LDL-C which is commonly referred to as very bad cholesterol raise the risk of heart disease by contributing to intake of fat in the arteries. It has been identified in the WHI trials that CEE submitted a decrease in LDL-C of approximately 11 percent of a placebo dose over six years, with a statistically significant ratio of geometric meant (0.89, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9, P<0.01). This implies that HT may be useful in reducing the amount of bad cholesterol, thus limiting the risk of heart diseases in the long run.

HDL Cholesterol (HDL-C): HDL-C which is referred to as the good cholesterol aids in the clearance of cholesterol in arteries. The result demonstrated an increase of 3.0 and 7.7 percent in HDL-C level of CEE and CEE+MPA, respectively, compared to placebo. This observation is good news to women taking HT since higher HDL-C is linked with a healthier heart.

Triglycerides: This is the fat in blood, which also with high levels can raise the risks in the cardiovascular. The trials determined that both CEE as well as CEE+MPA had increased triglycerides. This might counter the improvements achieved in LDL-C and HDL-C to indicate a multi-faceted balance in the provisions of HT.

Insulin Resistance: Insulin resistance is one step on the way to diabetes and may involve the heart. This was measured as the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR). CEE was responsible in reducing insulin resistance by 4.0% whereas CEE+MPA was less with a 0.8% reduction. There was also a sharp reduction in the levels of apolipoprotein(a), another marker of heart disease by 15.0 per cent with CEE alone and 20.0 per cent with CEE+MPA.

Age Differences Surprisingly, the study concluded that the changes in the biomarker were similar regardless of age groups despite the fact that HT has more adverse effects, cardiovascular wise to older ladies. This is an indication that whereas HT may have great effect in enhancing biomarkers, the general risk of heart disease may be subject to other influences such as occurrence of underlying health problems or severity of menopausal symptoms.

The Significance of Those Findings

These findings provide a balanced picture of HT concerning the cardiovascular system to those women who have passed through the tunnel of menopause. It shows a decrease in LDL-C and Insulin resistance, as well as an increase in HDL-C, which indicates a future prospect of preventing a heart disease. Nevertheless, increased triglycerides and early results in the coronary cardiovascular events like existence of coronary heart disease (CHD) are instigators, especially in the short-term of starting with HT. The study reports early rise in CHD risk with over time decline, which may be because of the presence of prothrombotic effects in the beginning, or arterial plaques.

Such results are especially pertinent in menopausal women who have age on their side and whose symptoms bother them such as night sweats or hot flashes. The improvements in the biomarkers place the HT as a possibility of symptom management though perhaps promoting heart health yet the rise in the levels of triglycerides and the early risks of developing CHD should be considered seriously. Women who have or are more prone to heart disease or are clot prone may have to give heavier consideration to these risks.

A diverse group of postmenopausal women aged 50 to 70 walking together in a sunny park, with glowing digital overlays showing heart health biomarkers like HDL, LDL, insulin, and lipoprotein(a) beside them. The image blends science and lifestyle in a warm, optimistic outdoor setting.

The future of Research?

The WHI research leaves space to additional inquiries. An example here would be to whether there is a possibility of inhibiting the adverse effect on triglycerides or HDL-C by going with different progestogen formulations. It is also likely that this paper recommended investigations of genetic disparities that could play a role in explaining the impact of HT on lipoprotein(a) on certain groups of populations. These options may result into more individualized methods of HT, by making it easier to treat individuals within their risk profile.

Women Takeaways

With regards to hormone therapy, this study highlights the use of consulting a doctor about the health of your heart. These are some of the main points that should be used to shape the discussion:

Evaluate Your Risk: Disclose your blood family history of heart disease, cholesterol, and any risks that lead to diabetes with your medical insurance.

Look at Timing: The research proposes that the effect of HT on heart health could be based on the timing on when you begin the therapy and your age.

Monitor Biomarkers: They are regular checkups which measures LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, and insulin resistance and help determine the effect of HT on your hear.

Compare Pros and Cons: Although HT can positively influence some cardiovascular biomarkers, the early risk of CHD development and hypertriglyceridemia are strong factors that have to be discussed in a balanced way.

The bigger Picture

WHI Hormone Therapy Clinical Trials give a major pie of the puzzle in the cardiovascular effects of HT. Although the increase in levels of LDL-C, HDL-C and decrease in insulin resistance are promising, triglycerides and early CHD risks simply put us back on track that HT is not a silver bullet in every situation. To ordinary people, this research shows the need to pursue this type of medicine making informed choices on how to handle menopausal symptoms and cardiovascular health by keeping in close contact with health professionals.

With knowledge and action, every woman can ensure that they approach their menopause in the best way as they simultaneously manage their symptoms and work towards the greater good of their lifelong health. The WHI study is one step towards women having information on how to exercise wise choices on such issues.


References

Nudy, M., et al. (2025). Long-Term Changes to Cardiovascular Biomarkers After Hormone Therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Therapy Clinical Trials. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 145(4), 357–367 https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005862

Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. While we strive to share accurate and up-to-date research, this content should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult your physician or a qualified healthcare provider with any questions regarding a medical condition. We do not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information. Any action you take based on the content of this blog is strictly at your own risk. This blog summarizes and interprets publicly available scientific research. We are not affiliated with the original authors or institutions.

Share